Login Signup
Verified Document

Employee Satisfaction And Productivity A Case Study Based On The ASDA Retailer Case Study

Related Topics:
A Worn Path Employee Benefits Employee Morale Build A Fire
Open Document Cite Document

Employee Satisfaction And Productivity

employee satisfaction and productivity

ASTRACT

Employee satisfaction directly links to organizational excellence and/or productivity. Maybe… Maybe not… Researchers regularly debate exactly what components contributing to employee satisfaction and the company's and/or organization's productivity. Similarly, employers and employees do not typically agree on the reason/s an employee stays committed to a company or what factors contribute to an employee's satisfaction with the company. During the mixed-method case study, the researcher focuses on employee satisfaction and productivity as well as investigates whether a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output. The study also examines factors that contribute to employee satisfaction, both on and off the job, and considers if "satisfaction" can be measured. If "yes," the researcher discusses how one can measure employee satisfaction; if "no," the researcher explains the reason/s for the incapability.

The hypothesis for the study asserts: A positive correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output. To further investigate the validity of the study's hypothesis confirming that a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output, the researcher created a survey which a number of participants completed anonymously. The researcher also recounts interviews with a several colleagues of ASDA.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1

Links to Question

1

Area of Study

2

Rationale for Study

3

Significance of Study

3

Organization of Study

3

Hypothesis & Research Questions

4

Study Aim and Objectives

5

Conclusion

6

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

7

For Success or Satisfaction

7

Employee satisfaction

9

Employer/Employee Perceptions of Employee Satisfaction

12

Factors Contributing To Employee Satisfaction

14

ASDA Reports

18

Measuring Employee Satisfaction and Productivity

21

ASDA Interviews

24

Conclusion

30

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

36

Findings from Measuring Data 36

36

Likert Type Format Scales

32

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS

36

Findings from Measuring Data

36

Factors Contributing to Employee Satisfaction

38

ASDA Reports

38

Measuring Employee Satisfaction and Productivity

39

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION

42

Hypothesis Validity Confirmed

42 Recount of Study Aim/Objectives

43

Study Review

44 Employer/Employee Perceptions of Employee Satisfaction

44

Factors Contributing to Employee Satisfaction

45

ASDA Reports

45

Measuring Employee Satisfaction and Productivity

45

ASDA Interviews

46

Conclusion

46

BIBLIOGRAPHY

48

APPENDIX A

52

ASDA Employee Satisfaction Questionnaire

53

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: ASDA's Central Office in Canberra

20

Figure 2: Factors Driving Employee Satisfaction

37

Figure 3: Eight Key Components for Satisfied Employees

38

Figure 4: ASDA Staff Survey Satisfaction Ratings

39

Figure 5: Three Simple Questions to Address Employee Satisfaction

39

Figure 6: Metrics Confirming Organization's Performance

40

Table 1: Types of Evidence

8

8

Table 2: Considerations for Creating Survey

35

Table 3: Employee Satisfaction Perceptions

37

Table 4: Employee Satisfaction Survey Considerations

40

ABBREVIATIONS

ASDA: initially Associated Dairies & Farm Stores Limited (ASDA 2005).

CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility (ASDA 2008).

ESI: Employee Satisfaction Index (Howell 2006, p. xiii).

OWL: Quality of Work Life (Howell 2006, p. 8).

RBT: Resource-Based Theory (Yang 2009, ¶ 1).

SHRM: Society for Human Resource Management (Clark 2005, ¶ 1).

TL: Transformational Leaders (Yang, 2009, Theoretical Background… Section ¶ 2).

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

"Employee satisfaction doesn't mean that work is easy or that employees are always happy.

Instead, satisfaction means committed employees who are willing to give their 'discretionary energy' to their work"

(Lavigna, 2010, What Drives… Section, ¶ 2).

Links to Question

Employee satisfaction directly links to organizational excellence and/or productivity. Perhaps, satisfied employees do in fact "create value in the services provided to customers, which in turn, has the potential to lead to customer satisfaction and subsequent loyalty," as well as productivity, as some researchers, like Andrew Robson, David Yarrow, and Jane Owen (2005) all with Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University Tyne, UK, argue. Or perhaps, employee satisfaction does not directly link to the organization's productivity. Perhaps, the employee's productivity and/or quality of the organization's products/services influence his satisfaction. In the study, "Does quality drive the employee satisfaction in the UK learning sector?," as Robson, Yarrow, and Owen examine the link between organizational performance and employee satisfaction, they, as various other researchers, find a number of contentions contribute to employee satisfaction.

Just as researchers do not all agree regarding components contributing to employee satisfaction and the organization's productivity, employers and employees do not typically agree on the reason/s an employee stays committed to a company or what factors contribute to an employee's satisfaction with the company. Perceptions of both the company and the employee may be subject to change as circumstances for both vary at times. During the mixed-method, qualitative case study, the researcher focuses on employee satisfaction and productivity as well as investigates whether a correlation...

The study also considers if "satisfaction" can be measured. If "yes," the researcher discusses how one can measure employee satisfaction; if "no," the researcher explains the reason/s for the incapability.
Area of Study

The location for the present study encompasses areas throughout the world as employees and productivity comprise global contemporary concerns and interests. The researcher, albeit, particularly focuses on ASDA, located in the UK. On July 26, 1999, Wal-Mart, a company founded in the United States (U.S.), purchased ASDA, initially founded in 1965 as Associated Dairies & Farm Stores Limited. During 2003, ASDA reportedly claimed the title of being the best company to work for in the UK. At one point during ASDA's history, however, colleagues described the company as the worst of all UK employers (ASDA, 2005).

No matter the location of the company or the organization, Bob Lavigna (2010), vice president of research for the Partnership for Public Service, asserts that when an organization has high levels of engagement, customer satisfaction as well as performance and productivity naturally follows. In the journal article, "Driving performance by building employee satisfaction and engagement: Good government requires good people, which is why the key to meeting our current challenges is talent-committed and engaged talent," Lavigna stresses that for a company or organization to obtain the maximum results from their investments, they should focus on employee engagement, which universally leads to employee satisfaction and links to the organization's productivity.

Rationale for Study

The primary reason/s for choosing to focus on employee satisfaction and productivity evolves from the interest in employee satisfaction as it links to the researcher's professional pursuit of a future in managing an organization and perhaps ultimately owning and operating a business. The researcher asserts that a better understanding of employee satisfaction and whether or not it directly links to organizational excellence and/or productivity will not only help the researcher professionally, but will also help readers as it relates contemporary considerations to ultimately contribute to the organization's success. As most individuals work as an employee or hold a position of leadership supervising employees at one point in their lives, employee, employee satisfaction affects the majority of individuals.

Significance of the Study

Increasing global competition mandates that contemporary companies and organizations maximize their productivity and quality to succeed. In the journal article, "Work attitude, loyalty, and employee turnover," Joel Tan, a research assistant, Vicky Tan, Professor, with the faculty of arts and social sciences, National University of Singapore and Tan Ngoh Tiong (2007), Professor of social work at Augsburg College, Minnesota, explain that employees with higher job satisfaction contribute to higher productivity. This study proves significant as it challenges readers to consider employee satisfaction and productivity as well as whether a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output and what factors contribute to employee satisfaction, both on and off the job.

Organization of Study

The organization of the thesis includes the following sections:

1. Introduction

2. Review of Literature

3. Methodology

4. Analysis

5. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations

Hypothesis and Research Questions

During the study's quest to determine whether a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output as well as examining factors that contribute to employee satisfaction, both on and off the job, the researcher seeks to determine the validity of the dissertation's hypothesis. The hypothesis for the study asserts: A positive correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output. To help determine the validity of the hypothesis, he researcher addresses the following three sub-questions?

1. What factors contribute to employee satisfaction, both on and off the job?

2. Can employee "satisfaction" be measured?

3. If employee "satisfaction" can be measured, how can this be done? If employee

"satisfaction" cannot be measured, what reasons may contribute to the incapability? The researcher also asserts that a correlation does exist between employee satisfaction and productivity/output and that "yes," satisfaction can be "measured."

To further investigate the validity of the study's hypothesis confirming that a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output, the researcher created a survey (Appendix A) which ***number of participants completed anonymously. The researcher also assesses a number of interviews with several colleagues of ASDA.

Study Aim and Objectives

Study Aim

During the study, the researcher's primary aim constitutes analyzing relevant literature as well as results of the researcher's survey and interviews to determine whether a correlation exists between employee satisfaction and productivity/output. During the survey of participants, the researcher investigates:

Employee satisfaction;

Employer/Employee perceptions of employee satisfaction;

Factors contributing to employee satisfaction;

ASDA reports;

Measuring employee satisfaction and productivity;

ASDA Interviews.

Study Objectives

Objective 1

Conduct a thorough review of literature relating to employee satisfaction and productivity/output; seeking specific information related to ASDA; including information applicable to employee satisfaction and productivity throughout the world.

Objective 2

Develop, implement and assess results evolving from a survey of ASDA employees and managers.

Objective 3

Analyze information retrieved through the literature review.

Analyze data retrieved through the implementation of the survey.

Analyze data/information the interviews reveal.

Present compilation of findings from the literature review as well as from the survey and the interviews during the analysis chapter of the dissertation.

Objective 4

Discuss study, offer conclusions and recommendations regarding the study and information the study reveals.

Conclusion

During the next section of the thesis, the review of literature, the researcher examines and presents information from the "family" of literature…

Continue Reading...
Sources used in this document:
BIBLIOGRAPHY

ASDA beats sales and profits targets 2008. Talking Retail. [Online]. Available at: http://www.talkingretail.com/news/industry-news/8629-asda-beats-sales-and-profits-targets.html

[Accessed 21 August 2010].

ASDA/WAL-MART A Corporate Profile. 2004. Corporate Watch UK. [Online]. Available at: http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=800 [Accessed 29 July 2010].

ASDA Stores. 2010. dooyoo GmbH - consumer reviews and price comparison. [Online]. Available at: http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/employment/asda-stores/1361787 / [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Barnes, Rachel 2005. In need of therapy? In a year in which a major restructuring has resulted in 1,400 redundancies, does Asda's smiley-face brand image really reflect the mood within the company? Grocer. William Reed Ltd. [Online]. Available at: HighBeam Research. http://www.highbeam.com Accessed 16 August 2010].
Beckett, Alex 2007. Thank God for a great store: Store manager Andrew Ball has taken service at Asda's Frome branch in Somerset to a new level. Shoppers have access to affordable top-quality products and even an in-store chaplain. Grocer. William Reed Ltd. 2007. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research.: http://www.highbeam.com [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Brown, Ian. T. 2009. In Western Europe, More Partners Than Bosses; Work partnerships improve satisfaction and productivity. Gallup Poll News Service. Gallup Organization. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1193151470.html [Accessed 28 July 2010].
Case study: Work-life balance helps to motivate Asda employees. 2007. Employee Benefits. Centaur Communications Limited. HighBeam Research. [Online]. Available http://www.highbeam.com [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Clark, Margret M. 2005. Employees, HR differ on satisfaction factors. HRMagazine. Society for Human Resource Management. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-135458470.html [Accessed 22 July 2010].
Climbing the ladder: Neil Nugent: Head development chef, ASDA. 2008. Grocer. William Reed Ltd. [Online]. Available at: HighBeam Research. http://www.highbeam.com [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Davolt, Steve. 2006. Reduced-load scheduling: Lightening workload heightens job satisfaction, productivity. Employee Benefit News. SourceMedia, Inc. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-144577003.html [Accessed 28 July 2010].
Emerson, Newton 2006. Older staff ASDA be good. The Mirror (London, England). MGN Ltd. [Online]. Available at: HighBeam Research. http://www.highbeam.com [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Employer perceptions about job satisfaction factors do not match employee reality; Salary.com survey reveals disconnects between employers' perceptions of employee job satisfaction factors and why employees stay or leave a job. 2006. Business Wire. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141436289.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Employee Satisfaction Questionnaire. 2009. Polaris Marketing Research, Inc. [Online]. Available at: http://www.polarismr.com/surveys_employeesat.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Falletta, Salvatore V. 2008. Organizational Intelligence Surveys. T + D. American Society for Training and Development. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1519077661.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Haynes, Paula J. And Beverly K. Brockman. 2009. Satisfaction, stress, and entrepreneurial intentions. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal. The DreamCatchers Group, LLC. [Online]. Available at: HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-219062901.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Hyde, Mark A. 2010. Warping of work space: Forget about formal employee satisfaction surveys. Supervision. National Research Bureau. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-218592271.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Iheriohanma, EBJ. 2009. Organisational Knowledge Leadership And Employee Productivity: A Study Of Imo State, Nigeria Civil Service. Ife Psychologia. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1868805651.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
In short-term, job security equals job satisfaction. 2009. HRMagazine. Society for Human Resource Management. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-206692997.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence and Finegan, Joan 2005. Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage. Nurse Economics; 23(1):6-13. Jannetti Publications, Inc. [Online]. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/500817_1 [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Lavigna, Bob. 2010. Driving performance by building employee satisfaction and engagement: Good government requires good people, which is why the key to meeting our current challenges is talent -- committed and engaged talent. Government Finance Review. Government Finance Officers Association. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-220201672.html [Accessed 22 July 2010].
Lee, Christopher. 2007. Should I stay or should I go? Uncover the eight cornerstones of an effective employee recruitment and retention program. Units. National Apartment Association. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-164157465.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Literature Review. N.d. Sections of the research report. Brigham Young University. [Online]. Available at http://linguistics.byu.edu/faculty/henrichsenl/ResearchMethods/RM_3_03.html [Accessed 29 July 2010].
McNair, Steve. 2005. Employee Productivity. Today. Association for Work Process Improvement. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-875545701.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Metlen, Scott. 2007. Relationships among facets of employee satisfaction: Why managers should care. International Journal of Business Strategy. International Academy of Business and Economics. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-178220116.html [Accessed 22 July 2010].
Mills, Peter R. 2005. The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity. Ehow journal. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/1 [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Mishra, Sita. & Gupta, Bindu. 2009. Work place motivators & employees' satisfaction: A study of retail sector in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-210224383.html [Accessed 22 July 2010].
Perry, Ronald W. And Lawrence D. Mankin. 2007. Organizational trust, trust in the chief executive and work satisfaction. Public Personnel Management. International Personnel Management Association. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-165575403.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
People. 2005. Australian Sports Drug Agency. [Online]. Available at: http://www.asada.gov.au/publications/annual_reports/asda_annual_report_2005_06/people.htm [Accessed 16 August 2010].
Robson, Andrew, Yarrow, David, & Owen, Jane 2005. Does quality drive the employee satisfaction in the UK learning sector? [Online]. Available at: http://northumbria.openrepository.com/northumbria/bitstream/10145/35132/2/Does%2520quality%2520drive%2520employee%2520satisfaction%2520in%2520the%2520UK%2520learning%2520sector.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2010].
Scott, Andrea. 2009. Salesperson Agency and Turnover: A Research Proposal for Naturalistic Exploration of Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Identity. Journal of Global Business Issues. Journal of Global Business Issues. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1861170131.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Tan, Joel, Vicky Tan and Tan Ngoh Tiong. 2007. Work attitude, loyalty, and employee turnover. Today's Manager. Singapore Institute of Management. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-164421459.html [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Tellis. Winston. (1997, September). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report. [ Online]. Available at http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2.html?ref=dizinler.com [Accessed 29 July 2010].
Whitaker, Brian G. And Jessica L. McKinney. 2007. Assessing the measurement invariance of latent job satisfaction ratings across survey administration modes for respondent subgroups: A MIMIC modeling approach. Behavior Research Methods. Psychonomic Society, Inc. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1361691831.html [Accessed 31 July 2010].
White Paper: Employee Obesity is Number One Factor in Productivity Loss. 2006. PR Newswire. PR Newswire Association LLC. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com [Accessed 30 July 2010].
Yang, Yi-Feng. 2009. An investigation of group interaction functioning stimulated by transformational leadership on employee intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction: An extension of the resource-based theory perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal. Scientific Journal Publishers, Ltd. [Online]. Available at HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-221654527.html [Accessed 22 July 2010].
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now